March 18, 2002
Reading Mr. James Hackett’s March 7 article “A
Place in WHOville for Taiwan” , I find it misleading
and legally groundless. I am writing to share with the
readers some facts concerning this issue.
It is common knowledge that the United
Nations is an inter-governmental international organization
whose membership is confined to sovereign states. The World
Health Organization (WHO) is a UN specialized agency.
According to the UN Charter, only sovereign states are
eligible for its membership. As part of China, Taiwan has no
qualification whatsoever to participate in WHO
activities. As early as
1971, the UN General Assembly passed resolution 2758
recognizing the representation of the Government of the
People’s Republic of China as the only legitimate
representatives of China to the United Nations and
expelling forthwith the representatives of Taiwan
from the place which they unlawfully occupy at the United
Nations and in all the organizations related. Accordingly,
in 1972, WHA(World Health Assembly, the supreme authority of
WHO) through Resolution WHA25.1, decides to recognize the
representatives of the Government of the People’s
Republic of China as the sole legitimate representatives of
China to the World Health Organization, and to expel
forthwith the representatives of Taiwan from the place that
they unlawfully occupy at the World Health Organization.
Thus, solving once and for all, in political, legal and
procedural terms, the issue of China’s representation
at the WHO. These are the legal basis on which WHA
rightly rejected, for 5 times in succession since 1997, and
with overwhelming majority, the so-called proposal of
“Inviting Taiwan to participate in the WHO as an
observer.” Mr.
Hackett claimed in his article that Taiwan has no access to
the information of the WHO because it is excluded from the
activities of the WHO. These arguments do not stand up under
scrutiny.
During a recent interview with the Foreign Policy
magazine, Ms. Gro Harlem Brundtland, the Director-General of
WHO, pointed out: “The Taiwan authorities
are not really excluded from information sharing, they have
access to all of our documents, everything. The problem,
again, is a political one. In this case, those who want a
change in Taiwan’s status use health concerns to make
their point.”
Needless to say, the real intention of
the Taiwan authorities is not to promote the health,
well-being of Taiwan compatriots, as they claim, but rather
attempt to create “two Chinas” or “One
China, One Taiwan” in the world arena, making trouble
and instigating confrontation in cross-strait
relations. WHO and WTO
are two international organizations of different nature and
with different membership qualifications. WHO is a UN
specialized agency, WTO is not. While WTO includes countries
and separate customs territories, only sovereign states are
eligible for WHO membership. When Mr. Hackett cited
Taiwan’s recent entry into WTO as a precedent to
participate in WHO, he is really mixing things up.
Mr. Hackett
had it right when he said that President Bush had a
successful trip to China last month. But he is wrong and
irresponsible to propose exploiting this opportunity to play
up Taiwan’s participation in WHO, since it runs
counter to the UN charter, relevant UN resolutions and the
one-China policy of the US government, poisoning
cross-straits relations and will cause damage to China-US
relations. In the end, it will hurt US own interests.
China-US
relations have seen steady improvements recently. President
Jang Zemin and President Bush met twice within four months,
and reached a common understanding on working towards a
constructive and cooperative relationship. This has not come
easily and is worth cherishing.
Taiwan has been an inalienable part of Chinese
territory since ancient times. The question of Taiwan bears
on China’s sovereignty and territorial integrity, and
it is the most important and sensitive issue at the core of
China-US relations. Only when the three Sino-US joint
communiques are strictly observed and the question of Taiwan
properly handled can there be stability and growth in
China-US relations. If
Mr. Hackett is genuinely concerned with the health and
well-being of our Taiwan compatriots, he might as well
persuade the Taiwan authorities to recognize the one China
principle and stop such separatist activities as squeezing
into WHO. This will help ease tension across the Taiwan
Straits, and will do good to a stable and healthy China-US
relations. It will be in China’s interest, as well as
in the interest of the US.
|